World Bank · Public Sector

Samoa: CPIA transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector rating

4ordinal scale · 20250.0% since 2015

The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Transparency, Accountability, and Corruption in the Public Sector criterion assesses the extent to which the executive, legislators, and other high-level officials can be held accountable for their use of funds, administrative decisions, and results obtained. Accountability is generally enhanced by transparency in decision-making, access to relevant and timely information, public and media scrutiny, and by institutional checks (e.g., inspector general, ombudsman, or independent audit) on the authority of the chief executive. The criterion covers four dimensions: (a) the accountability of the executive and other top officials to effective oversight institutions; (b) access of civil society to timely and reliable information on public affairs and public policies, including fiscal information (on public expenditures, revenues, and large contract awards); (c) state capture by narrow vested interests; and (d) integrity in the management of public resources, including aid and natural resource revenues. Annual figures for Samoa from 2005 to 2025.

20052025

Every year

YearValue (ordinal scale)Note
20254
20244
20234
20224
20214
20204
20194
20184
20174
20164
20154
20144
20134
20124
20114
20104
20094
20084
20074
20064
20054

Source

Published by World Bank, produced by World Bank Group. Licence: CC BY 4.0. Retrieved 2026-11-08.

The dataset for every country, with quality and provenance →

Cite or download

World Bank (2026). CPIA transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector rating. Interva. https://interva.co/dataset/worldbank-cpia-transparency-accountability-and-corruption-in-the-public (accessed 2026-11-14). catalog snapshot 2026-11-08.

JSON, SamoaAPI and MCP

CPIA transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector rating in other countries

Rank Samoa against its region, see where publishers disagree, or ask a question in plain words on the Interva desk.

Samoa: CPIA transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector rating (2005–2025) · Interva